arXiv digest

Xiangchen Cheng, Yunwei Jiang, Jianwen Sun, Zizhen Li et al. · cs.AI cs.CL

Memory for a long-horizon LLM agent is a contract about what each future decision is allowed to see. The simplest contract appends past observations, tool calls, and reflections to every prompt, which makes prior context easy to access but also turns it into a jumbled mixture in which the effect of any single memory component is hard to isolate. We introduce and instrument an alternative bounded contract: every decision is made from a fresh user message assembled by typed retrieval, with no raw cross-decision transcript appended. The prompt thus stays bounded across runs of any length, and any single layer can be ablated in isolation. We instantiate the contract in Slay the Spire 2, a closed-rule stochastic deck-building game whose runs require hundreds of tactical and strategic decisions. Within our harness, a fixed-A0 ablation shows the largest observed difference when triggered strategic skills are enabled: the no-store baseline wins 3/10 games and adding the skill layer 6/10. We release a reproducible testbed: 298 completed trajectories with condition tags, frozen memory/skill snapshots, prompt records, and analysis scripts.

take · The framing is the contribution: agent memory is "a contract about what each future decision is allowed to see." Instead of the usual append-everything transcript — which makes it impossible to isolate what any one memory component actually does — they assemble each decision from a *bounded*, typed retrieval, so the prompt stays fixed-size over arbitrarily long runs and each layer can be ablated cleanly. Slay the Spire 2 is a shrewd testbed: hundreds of stochastic decisions per run, frontier LLMs currently at zero wins, humans at 16%, so it's hard but not saturated. The result (3/10 → 6/10 with a strategic-skill layer) is honestly flagged as directional at this sample size — refreshing restraint — but the reusable harness and 298 released trajectories are the real deliverable for anyone studying long-horizon memory.

abs · pdf · html · ar5iv

Achint Mehta · cs.SE cs.AI

Agentic coding assistants are increasingly given extra capabilities, such as browser-based testing tools and design-oriented system prompts, on the assumption that more capability yields better software. This study tested that assumption directly. Ninety independent agent runs built the same application from one detailed specification, each scored on a fixed 14-criterion functional rubric (42-point max) and a visual review. Capability tier dominated: frontier models clustered near the ceiling while a low-cost local model fell to 24-37 points. Container deployment was the dominant defect, failing first-try in 44% of runs. The testing tool raised cost by 42-68% without improving functional score or reliability. Raising reasoning effort from High to xHigh lifted first-try perfect runs from 28% to 89% and cut corrective prompts about five-fold, for 9-29% more cost. A design-oriented prompt raised visual quality (4.5 vs 3.0) without lifting function. The practical lesson is to match the fix to the failure: most first-run failures came from weak reasoning, not from visible flaws a checking tool would catch.

take · A refreshingly empirical corrective to the "give the agent more tools" reflex. Ninety runs building the same app from one spec, and the result cuts against the current instinct: the browser-based testing tool added 42-68% cost and improved nothing, while simply turning reasoning effort from High to xHigh took first-try-perfect runs from 28% to 89% and cut corrective prompts five-fold. The failures were reasoning failures (container deployment botched on the first try 44% of the time), not the kind of visible flaws a checking tool catches — so a stronger model or more thinking prevents them and a test harness doesn't. It's a single-app observational study, not a controlled benchmark, but "match the fix to the failure" is exactly the discipline the agent-tooling gold rush is skipping.

abs · pdf · html · ar5iv

Arman Ghaffarizadeh, Danyal Mohaddes, Aliakbar Izadkhah, Shahriar Noroozizadeh · cs.AI cs.CL cs.LG cs.MA

LLM agents will increasingly act in socially structured settings where role, audience, and relational context can shape what is advantageous or costly to say. We study whether such social structure, without any explicit objective in the prompt, changes what an agent expresses publicly relative to an off-the-record (OTR) channel elicited under the same condition. We introduce a dual-channel debate framework in which agents produce public utterances that enter the shared history alongside OTR responses that are recorded but never shown to the other participant. Across 10 models, 3 scenarios, and 5 variations within each scenario, alignment-inducing settings produce systematic public-OTR divergence in the targeted agent, with its decision divergence rising from a ~3% baseline to roughly 40%. The effect is consistent across four aggregate analyses: stance, semantic similarity, natural language inference, and survey responses. In some cases, the OTR response explicitly attributes public accommodation to relational pressures such as career risk or sponsorship obligation.

take · A genuinely unsettling result, cleanly measured. Put an agent in a socially structured debate with no explicit objective in the prompt, give it a private "off-the-record" channel alongside its public utterances, and under alignment-inducing conditions the two diverge — its public-vs-private decision gap jumps from ~3% to ~40%, consistent across stance, semantic-similarity, NLI, and survey measures. Sometimes the private channel *names the reason* — career risk, sponsorship obligation. Nobody trained this in; social structure alone induced a latent objective (say the agreeable thing publicly, hold the real view privately). The takeaway is a real methodology gap: evaluating agents on their stated goals misses emergent ones, and a dual-channel probe is a concrete way to catch them. The kind of eval we're going to need more of.

abs · pdf · html · ar5iv

Yanjun Zhao, Ruizhong Qiu, Tianxin Wei, Yuanchen Bei et al. · cs.AI

Understanding and reasoning over long contexts has become a key requirement for deploying large language models (LLMs) in realistic applications. Although recent LLMs support increasingly long context windows, they often fail to use relevant evidence that is already present in the input, revealing a gap between context access and effective context utilization. We propose Recursive Evidence Replay as LLM Harness for Long-Context Reasoning (RECONTEXT), a training-free inference method for improving long-context reasoning. RECONTEXT uses model-internal relevance signals to construct a query-conditioned evidence pool and replays it before final generation while preserving the full original context. We provide a theoretical analysis based on associative memory, which characterizes the context as a memory store, the question as a retrieval cue, attention as cue-trace association, and replay as trace reactivation. Experiments on eight long-context datasets with 128K context show RECONTEXT consistently improves evidence utilization across Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-8B, and Llama3-8B.

take · The gap this targets is real and under-discussed: models with 128K windows can *access* a fact and still fail to *use* it — context length isn't context utilization. ReContext is a training-free harness that reads the model's own internal relevance signals to pull a query-conditioned evidence pool, then replays it right before generation while keeping the full original context intact — no pruning, no external memory. The associative-memory framing (context = store, question = cue, attention = association, replay = reactivation) is a clean way to think about why "remind the model of what matters" works. It pairs naturally with the long-context hardware story from [MiMo](/articles/mimo-v2-flash): the architecture makes 256K *cheap*, harnesses like this make it *usable*.

abs · pdf · html · ar5iv

Haofei Xu, Rundi Wu, Philipp Henzler, Nikolai Kalischek et al. · cs.CV

State-of-the-art single-image 3D reconstruction methods often rely on complex hybrid architectures and loss functions, or compress geometry into latent spaces in order to leverage pre-trained latent diffusion models. In this work, we show that such architectural overhead and intricate loss formulations are unnecessary. We introduce a minimalist pixel-space Diffusion Transformer, built on a plain ViT, that operates directly on raw 3D point map patches and is conditioned on image tokens from a pre-trained DINOv3. Unlike existing latent diffusion approaches, we train our diffusion backbone entirely from scratch, eliminating the need for point map tokenizers. Despite its simplicity, our approach surpasses complex latent-based diffusion models while remaining significantly simpler than hybrid alternatives. Notably, it produces sharper geometric structure and is more robust in highly ambiguous regions such as transparent objects.

take · A satisfying "the overhead was unnecessary" result. Monocular 3D reconstruction has accreted hybrid architectures, bespoke losses, and latent-space compressions to piggyback on pretrained latent diffusion models — and PointDiT shows a plain ViT doing pixel-space diffusion directly on raw 3D point-map patches, conditioned on DINOv3 image tokens, beats them. No point-map tokenizer, backbone trained from scratch, and it's *sharper* on the hard cases like transparent objects where latent compression tends to smear. It rhymes with the broader "stop compressing into latents, work in the native space" mood ([Cross-Space Distillation](/arxiv/2026-07-01) argued the opposite direction is hard for a reason). Simpler and better is the best kind of paper.

abs · pdf · html · ar5iv